If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Defendant,

1. On April 2, 2012, around 04:10 on April 2, 2012, the victim D, who was a taxi engineer, who had been placed a trial cost as a matter of charge in front of the C public security center located in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City, explained the situation to police officers, the victim expressed the above victim’s desire to read “this spile, not to be exempted from cash,” and “this sponse.”

2. The victim E, who was a police official who had verbally expressed a bath to the D above at the above time and place for about 10 minutes, such as “this chex gue”,

3. Around that time, a police officer was arrested in the act of committing an act of committing a crime at the Public Security Center, and seven police officers were in the above public security center, the son F, who was a police officer, was scamed for about 15 minutes of drinking distance. The son, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;