재물손괴등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
항소 이유의 요지 사실 오인 재물 손괴의 점과 관련하여, 피고인은 2017. 5. 14. D 어린이집에서 인터폰 카메라, 전기 계량기 계기판, 주차금지 안내판에 빨간색 락 카를 뿌린 사실이 없고, 2017. 5. 24. 피해자 F의 집에서 주소 팻말, 초인종, 방범용 경보장치에 빨간색 락 카를 뿌린 사실도 없다.
At the time of the instant case, the Defendant was physically and mentally deprived or physically weak.
The sentencing (one year of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.
항소 이유에 대한 판단 사실 오인 주장에 관하여 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면, 피고인이 2017. 5. 14. 21:14 경 서울 강북구 C에 있는 D 어린이집에서 피해자 강북구 소유인 인터폰 카메라, 전기 계량기 계기판, 주차금지 안내판에 빨간색 락 카를 뿌려 손괴한 사실, 2017. 5. 24. 23:30 경 서울 강북구 E에 있는 피해자 F의 집에서 주소 팻말, 초인종, 방범용 경보장치에 빨간색 락 카를 뿌려 손괴한 사실이 충분히 인정된다.
Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.
In light of the background leading up to the instant crime, the means and method of the instant crime, the Defendant’s behavior, and the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the Defendant had no or weak ability to discern things at the time of the instant crime.
Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.
Sentencing has been punished several times as violent crimes, and there is a disadvantage to the defendant, such as that he has been punished.
However, in the trial of the party, the victim G expressed his/her intention that he/she does not want the punishment against the defendant, and the defendant is unable to have a health condition due to mental disorder, and all other records and arguments such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and result, and circumstances after the crime are revealed.