A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the crime of this case is not good and that the defendant committed the crime of this case again even though he had a previous conviction in several times, strict punishment against the defendant is needed.

However, taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided; (b) the degree of injury suffered by the victim is not serious; (c) the Defendant agreed with the victim; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sex and environment; (b) the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) the conditions of sentencing specified in the present argument, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate; and (d) the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too heavy or unreasonable; and therefore, the above argument by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.