A. The Plaintiff is a company operating a village bus B (hereinafter “instant bus”).

B. In order for pedestrians to build a road at the center of the road, the bus stops located in Seoyang-dong, Busan-gu, where the bus in this case passes through, must pass the crosswalk installed on the roadway, delivery connected to the bus stops, and the crosswalk installed on the new roadway in order.

C. On March 12, 2016, at around 22225, the Defendant opened a crosswalk at the location of the stop station at the time of a green on-and-off signal, and when the pedestrian signal has been changed to the delivery part at the center of the road before the entire passage of the road, the Defendant stopped walking in the part of India because the pedestrian signal has been changed to red.

On the other hand, the bus of this case began to pass through the above crosswalk in accordance with the signals.

However, the Defendant re-enters the bus forward of the instant bus at the time when the bus passes the crosswalk, and the Defendant conflicts with the front part of the instant bus.

(hereinafter “instant accident”) e.

As a result, the defendant is receiving treatment by suffering 6 weeks of injuries, such as cutting down the body part of the body part of which detailed is unknown.

On the other hand, the bus of this case discovered the defendant and rapid stop, and became part of the passengers inside the bus due to its influence, and the plaintiff paid 50,000 won to the passenger C on April 6, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 2, 4, and 5, the result of the examination by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff discontinued the Defendant’s walk in India while pedestrian signal was red, but it was extremely difficult for the Defendant to avoid it as a bus driver in the future of the instant bus, and thus, there is no liability for damages against the Defendant in relation to the instant accident.