When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant was elected as B member at the six simultaneous local elections all over the country, and served as B member from July 1, 2014. At the seven simultaneous local elections all over the country, he/she was reappointed as B member and is currently in office as B member.

A National Assembly member, a local council member, the head of a local government, the representative of a political party, a candidate (including a person intending to become a candidate) and his/her spouse shall not make contributions to persons in the constituency concerned, or institutions, organizations, facilities, or any other persons having relations with a resident in the constituency concerned, or institutions, organizations, or facilities even if they are outside the Gu concerned.

1. On July 2016, the Defendant visited a senior citizen center in C, and provided ten persons, such as members E and F, for the elderly, and provided approximately 10-15 breabbbbbb in a dial where the market price is unknown.

Accordingly, the defendant, who caused the local council, made a contribution act to the person in the constituency concerned.

2. Around June 2017, the Defendant visited the H senior citizen center located in G and gave approximately 15 persons, including the general senior citizen center I and the members J and K, etc., and delivered 15 and 15 and brecuous brecing to I, where the market price is unknown.

Accordingly, the defendant, who caused the local council, made a contribution act to the person in the constituency concerned.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on each prosecutor's statement protocol to E and I;

1. Article 257 (1) 1 and Article 113 (1) of the Act on the Election of Public Officials for the Punishment of Crimes and the Selection of Punishment for the Punishment of Crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The Defendant asserts that the act of donation in this case does not violate social rules and its illegality is excluded. The Defendant’s assertion as to Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which held that the act of donation in this case is unlawful.

However, the Public Official Election Act is likely to contribute to the establishment of a foundation for support of candidates or to be connected with a purchase act.