beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.20 2014가단5151390

채무부존재확인

Text

1. In relation to each insurance contract listed in the separate sheet, there is no damages liability against the plaintiff against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 8, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant’s living Nonparty B as listed below, and upon the Defendant’s request for change of contractor, the policyholder Nos. 3 and 5 set forth below was 1 C non-dividend Dless Dividends Pension Policy - 200,000 on December 9, 2004 when the date of the contract with the Defendant’s securities number B or the Defendant’s termination of the contract, and 2Dless Dividends Social Insurance 521,000 won on November 23, 2005, 100 E non-dividend Pension Policy - 10,000 won on September 3, 2010, 200, 1000 won on September 17, 201, 10, 1000 won on July 1, 2005, 105, 100,000 won on September 14, 2006.

(1) According to the certificate of evidence No. 4 of the above Table No. 3 and No. 5 as an insurance contract written in the annexed sheet No. 3 and No. 5, the insurance contract of this case is also recruited by H, the insurance contractor is the defendant, and there is also a securities number I signed on July 15, 2003 with B, and a securities number J, which was concluded on March 17, 2004, and a securities number J, which was concluded on March 17, 2004 with the securities name-free dividend insurance.

B. Of the above insurance contracts, the insurance contracts Nos. 2 to 5 were concluded by B through H through the Plaintiff’s insurance solicitor.

C. On April 2014, the Defendant asserted that H’s duty to explain was neglected, deceiving, etc., and filed a civil petition with the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry (including a serial number) in Gap 1 through 4, the purport of whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Defendant’s assertion includes the following facts: (a) the possibility of principal loss loss and the possibility of cancellation refund to the Defendant during the process of acquiring the status of the policyholder of the instant insurance contract from Nonparty B on November 8, 2010; and (b) the fact that the Plaintiff and the insurance solicitor belonging to the Plaintiff may not extend to the principal.