If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On March 4, 2012, at around 09:40 on March 4, 2012, the Defendant driven a Cbea-cratty bus, and at the Jeju City, Japan Island 2, along the private distance of the election commission, straightened from the distance of the transformation station to the same light elementary school along the three-lane distance.

In such cases, a person who drives a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle with a duty of care to live well in the front left, and to protect the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and passed through the intersection, and the victim D (Nam, 37 years old) traveling in the opposite lane on the opposite lane due to the negligence of the center line, thereby passing through the intersection, received the front panion part of the Ekystar car operated by the victim D (Nam, 37 years old) as the front panion part of the said passenger vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, caused the Victim D and the victim F (mama and 53 years of age) to suffer from an injury to the climatic salt, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, the Defendant escaped from the said car without any necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the car to ensure that the amount equivalent to KRW 1,853,896 is damaged by the repair cost, and thus, providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of each traffic accident related to D or F;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of each written diagnosis and written estimate under Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime (the point of escape after the injury by occupational negligence in the market) and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of absence after the accident in the market);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (a punishment provided for in the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes against Victims F of the largest judgment with respect to each crime committed on the market, punishment and punishment among the crimes committed on the market, but selecting a fine);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant has reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.