A. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the defendant's appeal is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s appeal by the lower court is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant has a criminal history of at least 20 times, including eight times of punishment, and this case was intended to forge another person's resident registration certificate and establish a passbook in another person's name by using it, and then obtain money from another person, and thus, the crime is planned, and thus, is considered as a sentencing material disadvantageous to the defendant, and all of the crimes in the judgment of the defendant are recognized, and actual damage was inflicted upon the crime in this case.

Considering the fact that the defendant or the defendant seems to have no profit, the sentencing materials that are favorable to the defendant are considered as the sentencing materials, and considering the age, character and conduct, environment, background leading to this case, circumstances after the crime, and various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the court below's sentence against the defendant cannot be deemed to be too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit.

3. If so, the appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.