However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 01:00, the victim E (27 years) and the victim F (27 years of age) who were fluencingly fluenced in the Do-si in front of the Do-si Do-si, the Defendant flucing away from the back of the victim E who was flucing the urine without any reason, and flucing the her face of the victim E who was flucing the brucing of the 8 week flucing the flucing side of the 8 week flucing the flucing side of the 8 week flucing the flucing body, and flucing the f of the flucencing body that requires a treatment of approximately 2 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged parts of photographs and written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment (it shall be considered that the defendant has the same record as the defendant and that the degree of injury of the victims is not minor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (The following factors are considered: (i) the agreement with the victim E; (ii) the degree of damage to the victim F is relatively minor; (iii) the confession and reflect of the defendant; (iv) the defendant does not have any history of crime exceeding the fine; and (