beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.05.29 2019가단22511

제3자이의

Text

1. The Defendant’s non-party D is an executory exemplification of the payment order issued by the Seoul Southern District Court 2017 tea 51442.

Reasons

The Defendant seized the goods indicated in the attached list on November 14, 2019 based on the executory exemplification of the payment order for Nonparty D, Seoul Southern District Court 2017 tea 51442 against Nonparty D, but the fact that the said goods are owned by the Plaintiff is not a dispute between the parties.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim seeking non-permission of seizure execution is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.