However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a C Poter cargo vehicle.

On November 15, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on November 15, 2014, and proceeded with a long distance above the Office of Education of the Busan-si, Busan-si, Busan-do, from the yellow dust flood range to the area of the Clean Medical Center.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle with a duty of care to live well on the front side and left side and safely drive the motor vehicle.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 전방주시의무를 게을리 한 채 만연히 진행한 과실로 때마침 피고인 차량 진행방향 맞은편에서 교차로에 진입하여 좌회전 하고 있던 피해자 D(78세)이 운전하는 E CT100 오토바이 앞바퀴 우측 부분을 피고인 차량 앞 범퍼 우측 부분으로 들이받아 피해자와 위 오토바이에 동승하고 있던 피해자 F(여, 73세)가 튕겨서 도로에 떨어지게 하였다.

Ultimately, at around 19:18 on November 5, 2014, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the victim F to death in the ordinary hospital emergency room at the Jinju-si, Jinju-si, the low blood transfusion shock, etc., and around 20:45 on November 5, 2014, the victim D was the victim D from the ordinary hospital emergency room at the Ginju University Hospital.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to G and H;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Sites and photographs of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each death certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. While the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as "the grounds for sentencing"), the defendant neglected to perform his/her duty of care in advance and the result of the death of both the two victims is very serious, the defendant committed his/her crime on the other hand.