If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 01:15 on July 5, 2012, the Defendant: (a) provided that he did not provide E, a business owner, in the Gyeonggi-do Government’s “Damb” located in C; (b) provided that he did not provide E, a business owner, with the notification of 112; and (c) provided that G guards who were affiliated with the F Zone at the Gyeonggi-do Government Police Station, which called “Iam to look at CCTV installed in Annoba” during the course of being explained of the procedures, provided that he provided the G guards with the explanation that “this sarbling police has been distorted, and he was the same during the process, who died, and that he interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the report by G inspector by 112.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses G and E respective legal statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (112 reporters' confirmation, etc.);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.