However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 00:50 on January 30, 2017, when the Defendant visited the said main place and drinking alcohol to the customer, the Defendant: (a) had the victim E (43) who was the other customer visiting the said main place in drinking alcohol; (b) had the victim followed the Defendant at his/her hand once in drinking water; and (c) had the victim’s face with her hand in drinking water three times; and (d) had the victim flicked the flick; and (e) had the victim flicked the flick up to the floor; and (e) had the victim flick up to the floor; and (e) had the victim flicked about five minutes of the victim’s face; and (e) had the victim take care of his/her head, etc. for about four weeks so that he/she could not drive the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. E statements and related photographs;

1. A medical certificate (34 pages of evidence records);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (to listen to a statement by a shote F phone) (to the statement by a shote);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The portion not guilty of part of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (whether it is an injury to the neighboring land, etc. on the part of the body prior to the once);

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant committed an assault, such as a statement of facts constituting a crime, thereby inflicting bodily injury on the victim, “a part of the shoulder that requires approximately five weeks’ medical treatment, such as damage to the adjacent flag and power lines.”

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim was treated in the emergency room of the Jeju University Hospital on January 30, 2017, which was on the day of the instant case, and the medical records of the Jeju University Hospital at that time stated that the victim complained of “the pain of the left-hand shoulder,” etc. (hereinafter referred to as the 64th page), and on February 8, 2017, the fact that the Jeju University Hospital was diagnosed by “damage of the fresh’s fresh and power lines,” etc. (35 pages) is recognized.

B. The result of this Court’s factual inquiries with respect to the head of Jeju University Hospital is broken.