On November 24, 2014, the Defendant infringed on the copyright of the said copyright holder by using the computer program “AutCAD 2002”, “AutaCAD 2008”, “AutaD 2013”, “AutaCAD 2013”, and “Autafrash Ifracsk Ifracsk’s 2012” and “autacck’s 2012’s computer program “UGNX7.5”, a copyright holder of the said C office without permission, by reproducing eight computer programs, etc. in which “UGXD 2002” had the copyright.

2. Applicable provisions to the facts charged in judgment: An offense subject to prosecution subject to prosecution under Article 136 (1) 1 of the Copyright Act: The judgment dismissing the victims' complaint on March 10, 2015, which was after the prosecution under Article 140 of the Copyright Act (Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act).