문화재보호법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) in the case of a copy of the ledger for the sale of cultural heritage with the seal of approval of the Daegu market, which was submitted by the defendant as evidence that he had filed the instant stone in the year 1971; (b) in the case of a copy of the ledger for the sale of cultural heritage with the seal of approval of the Daegu market, a printed letter or line; (c) in the case of a copy of the ledger for the sale of cultural heritage with the seal of approval; (d) the defendant appears to have been voluntarily prepared by the defendant in view of the fact that the defendant applied for approval of a museum establishment plan in the year 2006; (e) the list of museum art gallery material submitted to Gyeongbuk-do, including the instant stone, did not include 6 I seat of H including the instant stone; and (e) according to the Zology, the defendant kept the instant stone in the cemetery around 1995 or in the non-existent point; and (e) the defendant did not conceal the remaining five seat in addition to the acquisition process of this case.
Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged in this case on the ground that there was no intention of concealment. In so doing, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected
Judgment
The judgment of the court below is affirmed by the defendant, who received 6th h. H I's tin purchased from Japan from Japan and exhibited it to the E museum. The defendant asserted that he temporarily stored the instant mar in a safe to conduct research on one of them (hereinafter "the instant mar"). The court below held that the defendant was holding the instant mar in a safe to correct it to the second mar of the E museum, but in full view of the following circumstances, the defendant's mar of this case.