2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

On July 31, 2017, at around 01:00, the Defendant driven a B-in car under the influence of alcohol with alcohol content of 0.209% at a distance of 2km from the front parking lot of the public health clinic located in the Dobong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) to the return road located in the same Eup/Myeon located in the same Eup/Myeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the arrest of the case, a report on the detection of the driver involved in the principal and the circumstantial statement of the driver involved;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the instant crime is not good in light of the background, risk, etc. of the crime.

The defendant has committed another crime even though he had the same record.

This is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant.

The Defendant led to confession and reflect on the crime of this case.

There is no record of other crimes except that the accused is punished by a fine for the same crime once in 2007.

This is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.

In addition, in consideration of all the circumstances shown in the arguments and records of the case, such as the age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.