A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

1. At around 18:31 on June 12, 2016, Defendant A: (a) at the 10th floor toilet in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, the Defendant: (b) on the ground that he was aware of the favorable value after being called out by the police officer I of the H district of the Seoul Urban Police Station H district and the police officer I of the Seoul Urban Police Station, who was called out to the site of the Happed G, and who was called out to the site of the Happed G, and was able to read him to return home, he was able to shot up with her own flab, shot, dead; and (c) was shot up with her hand, her flaf’s spath; and (d) was flafed one time by drinking the spath of I’s ch; and (d) was flafing the flaf’s flaf’s sing.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to 112 reports.

2. Defendant B, at the same time, and at the same place, and at the same time and place, the police officer I and the police officer J assaulted Defendant B, with the wheels of having the left side of the police officer I and the left side of the securityJ as a hand-to-saw, she knife the left side knife, and knife the left side knee knife.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness I and each legal statement of the J;

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol (part) against the Defendants

1. Place of work for a district unit;

1. Application of voice file CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B of a suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of the community service order: Determination of the Defendants and defense counsel’ assertion under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. Judgment on the assertion that there is no enemy who assaults the victims, or that there is no illegality because the police officer's illegal arrest was passively resistanceed.

A. The summary of the assertion is as follows.