However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant shall be the honorary Vice-Governor and the President of E-Organization, an incorporated association.

1. On December 31, 2012, the Defendant, at a coffee shop, where it is impossible to know the trade name in the south of Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, on December 31, 2012, the Defendant received the victim G who was aware of the employment problems of ordinary children through the paper F, and received a research paper written by the victim’s son, thereby making the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to find employment for the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the total amount of KRW 24 million from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and acquired KRW 26 million from the new bank account in the name of the Defendant to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant.

2. On May 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at a coffee shop in which the trade name on the second floor of the J of the Gwangju Mine District cannot be known; (b) how the Victim G was “ how the problem of Cheongdae employment for children was how or not.”

In accordance with the foregoing, “If only the books are issued in order to publish the order of the President in the form of a book,” the victims of the defect can purchase the books at the government department, so there is no problem in sales and may impose a lot of money. However, if only KRW 30 million is lent, 30 million won shall be issued in the form of a book, and if only KRW 30 million is lent, 3,000 won shall be repaid by the end of September 2013, and 50 million won shall be repaid by the end of December 2013. < Amended by Act No. 11383, Dec. 2, 2013>

“A false statement” was made.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to repay it normally until the promised date.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 30 million won from the victim to the new bank account under the name of the Defendant on the same day.