The defendant shall obtain money from W, who is an applicant for compensation, 250,000 won, and AZ.

2. In full view of the grounds for sentencing indicated in the arguments and records of the instant case, the lower court appears to have reasonably determined by fully considering the various grounds for sentencing alleged by the Defendant, and there is no special circumstance to ex post facto change the sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and since the application for compensation of W and Z is well-grounded, it is ordered to pay W to the defendant who is the applicant for compensation of W, 250,000 won by fraud, and 145,00 won by fraud, to AZ in accordance with Articles 25 (1) and 31 (1) through (3) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, etc., and provisional execution thereof is illegal since the application for compensation of AA, which is the applicant for compensation of the trial, is filed after the date of closing of argument at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the court, and is thus dismissed in accordance with Article 32 (1) and (2)