beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2013.07.15 2013고합5

수뢰후부정처사등

Text

Defendant

B The Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,00,000, and a fine of KRW 5,000,000, respectively.

The above defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

L, around November 201, in which the project cost is 28 billion won in a site of the 330,051 square meters in Gyeongbuk-do, North Korea, the L has implemented the "N" business (hereinafter referred to as the "instant business") including green culture, traditional experience, video culture, other experience, education, and video culture experience facilities, etc., in a limited competitive bid.

Defendant

A is a public official of Grade VI L administrative position who has worked as the head of the practical team promoting the project in this case at the 2015 Support Team by November 30, 201, and Defendant D is a public official of Grade VI L Administrative Grade VI who works as the head of the practical team promoting the project in this case from December 1, 2011 to the 2015 Support Team.

Defendant

B is a person who serves as a director of theO participating in the bidding of the instant project.

1. On October 25, 201, Defendant A offered entertainment equivalent to KRW 725,00,000, including alcoholic beverage, alcoholic beverage, and helper cost, upon request to the effect that “the Defendant may be selected as the contractor of the instant project” from the O, a bidder of the instant project, at Qu Jeju-gu P around 22:21, 201.

On January 7, 2012, the Defendant, at R around 20:57, sent each telephone to S at the same place at around 22:08 on the same day, notified S that the recommending body of the review committee of the instant project is AK center.

As a result, the Defendant received entertainment equivalent to KRW 725,00 from B, and committed an unlawful act after receiving a bribe in relation to the public official’s duties, and at the same time, disclosed the official secrets of public official B and S in accordance with the law.

2. Defendant B provided entertainment equivalent to KRW 725,00 to A, who is a public official in charge of the instant project, at the same time, and at the same place as above in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant given a bribe to A in relation to the public official's duties.

3. Defendant C around September 18, 201.