beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2013.08.22 2013고단444

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the business that operated "D" in Gangnam-si C 2, and E and F (Suspension of Prosecution on December 29, 2010, respectively) are the employees of the above game room.

1. No one shall provide the distribution or use of game products, the contents of which are different from those of the rating, or display or store such products for such purposes;

In collusion with E and F, from September 19, 2010 to September 27, 2010, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with E and F, “D”; (b) in the “B”; and (c) in line with the contents of the game, the game machine was originally rated by the user by manipulating the plastic and pressing of the game machine and by making it difficult for the user to obtain points from the screen board; (d) in spite of the fact that the user obtained the rating from the screen board, the Defendant installed 40 game equipment different from the contents of the rating, such as playing the game without any manipulation of the plastic and pressing, and provided it for the use of the contents different from the contents of the rating received against unspecified multiple customers.

As a result, the defendant, in collusion with E and F, provided game products with contents different from those rated by the Game Rating Board.

2. No one shall engage in business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products;

The Defendant, in collusion with E and F, exchanged in such a manner as to deduct 10% per 10% per book (one book per 5,000 points) acquired by customers through a “stoves islands” game at the above time and place, and exchange them with cash of 4,500 won.

In collusion with E and F, the Defendant exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. G statements;

1. Seizure records;

1. Investigation report (with respect to matters of alteration or alteration of game products on islands);

1. Mebato;

1. On-site photographs statutes;