If the above fine is not paid, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

피고인은 2016. 10. 13. 05:10경 동해시 천곡로 107에 있는 동해경찰서 형사팀 사무실에서, 노래주점에서 술값을 지불하지 않은 일로 사기죄의 현행범인으로 체포되어 와 있던 중 피고인을 데려가기 위해 위 사무실에 찾아 온 피고인의 아버지가 피고인을 훈계하며 피고인의 뺨을 2회 때리는 것을 동해경찰서 소속 경사 C이 말리자, 오른쪽 발로 위 경사 C의 엉덩이를 1회 걷어찼다.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning public peace and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph by cutting down each CCTV course;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order [the scope of recommendation] is against the mitigation area (the degree of violence is insignificant, one month or eight months of imprisonment) (the decision of sentence]. The degree of assault of this case is not more severe, the degree of assault of this case is not less than the same kind of power and suspension of qualification, the defendant's family environment and support relationship, etc., the decision of fine is to choose to leave the contents of the sentencing guidelines, and the sentence against the defendant is set as the order of the defendant.