However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 7, 2016, at around 21:40, the Defendant had a dispute with the victim D (n, 53 years of age) who is one’s wife, around 21:40 on August 7, 2016, at “Chop B, and 1st, and caused the victim to have a wound, which is a dangerous object of the table, once the part of the victim’s body was cut, and caused the victim to have a shock of about 3 cm.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Investigation report (the details of interviews with victims, photographs of damaged parts, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a photograph of victim as part of damage);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( Taking into account circumstances favorable to the defendant);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered circumstances favorable to the defendant);

1. Based on the reasoning of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the sentence shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the favorable sentencing factors such as the following: (a) a victim, who is the wife of the defendant, was suffering from mental and physical pain; (b) a defendant was punished several times of the past violence; (c) a defendant appears to have exercised domestic violence against the victim even before the crime of this case was committed; (d) a victim’s wife is deemed to have been committed; and (e) the defendant committed a second offense against his mistake; and (e) a defendant has no record of being punished for a suspended sentence or heavier; and (e) a defendant has no record of being punished.