If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On November 17, 201, the Defendant: (a) delivered to the “E” shop operated by the victim D located in the Jeonnam-gun, Manan-gun, Manan-gun, the Defendant Haban-gun, and (b) caused the misunderstanding of the victim’s son F as a hyke; and (c) Habndn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn.

1. On November 17, 201, the Defendant entering a residence intrusion: (a) the steel gate, which is closed up to the point of “E”, was opened so far and the victim opened a car and intruded into E shop used for business and residence without permission.

2. The Defendant: (a) opened a steel gate at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1) above; (b) opened an office door in which the victim gets sound while leaving the office door; (c) however, the Defendant broken up two of the office glass windows on the ground that the fluent victim did not open a door.

In this respect, the defendant damaged the victim's free will equivalent to 100,000 won in the city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes related to investigation reports (such as a housing chip entry), investigation reports (a written estimate, etc.);

1. Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts (the point of intrusion upon residence, the choice of fines), and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of causing property damage and the selection of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70 (1) and (2) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;