If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 1, 2019, the Defendant: (a) agreed to use one of the three-day LFaba car with a market price equivalent to KRW 10 million in the market price managed by the victim’s office at fixed-si (hereinafter omitted); and (b) did not comply with the request of the victim to return the said car by delivery from the victim for two days; and (c) embezzled the said car by failing to return it to the victim, by failing to comply with the request of the victim for return by no later than the 12th day of the same month, while operating the said car at an Ansan-si; and (d) embezzled the said car by failing to return it to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

Some statements of the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Complaints and vehicle rental contracts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements of victims);

1. Relevant Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;