beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.11.03 2016고단2620

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving a Radra car.

At around 09:30 on June 18, 2016, the Defendant proceeded at about 60 km from the border road to the parallel of the Jinhae-si, Changwon-si, by two-lanes from the parallel of the Taegu-si.

At the same time, the signal has been installed on the front door, so there was a duty of care to reduce the speed to the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle, to live well in the front door, and to prevent the accident by safely driving in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, neglected to change to a stop signal, and proceeded with the victim F. (72 years old) who walked on the right side of the instant vehicle driving by the victim B (the 58 years old) with the right side of the instant vehicle by taking the front side of the instant vehicle into the front left side of the instant vehicle and transferred it to the right right side by the shock, and caused the signboard to be faced with the victim F. (the 72 years old) who walked on the sidewalk.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury to the victim G (V, 33 years old) who was on board the said car, such as a pelleting (closed) in need of treatment for about three weeks, the injury to the victim B, such as salt and tensions, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim F in need of approximately four weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B is a person engaged in driving a rocketing taxi.

At around 09:30 on June 18, 2016, the Defendant continued to drive a three-lane road from the Happa-dong to the Happa-dong to the Happa-dong, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Do Do 3-lane.

Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving of motor vehicles to make a internship in the U.S. permitted section.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so.