beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.16 2017고단4461

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 4, 2017, around 15:23, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol in the vicinity of the 15:23th of Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant: (b) held the victim D (54) seated on the back seat of the head of the private taxi steering group; and (c) held the victim “a person in the direction of two ambly,” and (d) held the destination again while the victim was living near the children’s play place in the same Gu-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu;

In the case of the young, he saw that he saw that he saw that he saw that he is not a food for the young. He saw that he saw that he is not a food for the young, and that he saw that he saw that he was not a food for the young, the back part of the victim's timber was tightly sealed, and that he saw that he was a hand in the vicinity of the youth station in the same Gu, and that he was a hand in the vicinity of the G oil station in the vicinity of the F police box.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (report, etc. on visit to the release from a strike);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs, photographs, damaged photographs, and the taxi photographs operated by the victim;

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes concerning the relevant criminal facts and Article 5-10 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes that choose

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In addition, in light of the fact that the reasoning of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was many, the liability for the crime of this case is not somewhat minor, but the degree of damage is relatively minor, and the defendant does not want to be punished upon agreement with the victim, etc. In addition, considering the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, the punishment is determined as ordered.