However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 10:37, at the Southern-gu Busan Metropolitan City Women’s Track’s Ba; (b) opened a cell phone of an amount equivalent to KRW 850,000 (1,000) the market price of which includes one cell phone of an amount equivalent to KRW 1,50,000 (1,50,000), one of the mobile phone of an amount equivalent to KRW 1,50,000 (1,50,000) at the market price where the victim E puts back an object box attached to the shower by the shower; and (c) and (d) the key of a vehicle and identification card; and (d) removed one set at a standard of KRW 1,50,00,00 at the market price where the victim owned.

It was about to do so while intending to do so, and she was tried to have the wind, which was caught by a math's loss, by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1448, Apr. 1,

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation (it is possible to repeat a crime in light of the majority of the criminal records of the same kind);