전자금융거래법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Punishment of the crime
1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act on February 22, 2017 shall lend any access medium while promising to make a consideration;
Nevertheless, around February 22, 2017, the Defendant offered a proposal to the effect that he would lend a bank account from a person in a name in the name of Gwangju City to the extent of KRW 3 million each month, and that the new bank opened in the name of the Defendant was issued a copy of the Ckwikset Card connected to the Pkwikset Account (Account Number: C) and notified the password by telephone.
Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.
2. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act on February 24, 2017 shall lend any access medium while promising to make a consideration.
Nevertheless, on February 24, 2017, the Defendant sent a physical card back to the Etra located in Gwangju City D with the physical card re-issuance from the person who was not his/her name.
In response to the request, the head of the physical card connected to the account in paragraph 1 was reissued, and the Kwikset Service issued the name to the above person and notified the password by telephone.
Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation (in cases of attaching a certificate of confirmation of deposit), investigation report (in cases of attaching a seizure warrant and reply);
1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the selection of a fine for the option of punishment;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order is not only impairing the safety and trust of financial transactions, but also can be abused as a means of other crimes. The cream card leased by the Defendant is also used for the crime of singishing, and the Defendant’s cream card.