The application for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.

[2012 Highest 2493] On September 2009, the Defendant: (a) provided 10 billion won to the victim D introduced from F at the coffee shop in Daejeon Seodong-gu, Daejeon; (b) provided that “B shall operate G, and obtain loans from foreign banks; (c) he/she shall also take the lead in foreign capital and conduct construction in the large exhibition; (d) in recent years, he/she shall bring foreign capital in an amount of 80 billion won; (e) received 50 billion won loan from the Switzerland bank; (b) received the 150 billion won loan from the Switzerland bank; (c) received the 150 billion won loan from the Switzerland; and (d) obtained the 50 billion loan from the Switzerland bank under the pretext of the Switzerland; and (e) obtained the 150 billion loan from the Switzerland apartment store to obtain 150 billion won loan from the Switzerland bank located at the end of September 2009.

However, the defendant is true.