beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.08.31 2017가합60524

청구이의

Text

1. The Defendant’s judgment of Gwangju District Court on January 11, 2013 (main office) and 201Reu58 (Counterclaim) against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking divorce, division of property, etc. with the Gwangju Family Court 2008Ddan3870. The said appellate court rendered a final judgment ordering the Defendant to pay KRW 1,466,322,250 as division of property on January 11, 2013, when the Defendant received KRW 1,466,32,250 as division of property from the Plaintiff, and upon receiving KRW 1,466,32,250 as division of property from the Plaintiff, he/she completed the registration procedure for transfer of ownership based on the fixed date of division of property, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,46,32,250 as division of property from the Defendant, and the final judgment of the appellate court became final and conclusive by the final judgment of the Supreme Court 2013Meu528, which is the final and conclusive judgment of the final and conclusive judgment of the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land”).

B. On April 22, 201, the Defendant, while continuing the above appellate trial, transferred KRW 650,000,000 to C, among the Defendant’s right to claim a division of property against the Plaintiff, and notified the Plaintiff of the transfer on August 4, 201. On June 29, 2012, the Defendant transferred KRW 1,00,000, out of the above right to claim a division of property, to C, and notified the Plaintiff of the transfer on July 4, 2012.

C. Meanwhile, D and E filed a lawsuit against the Defendant and C seeking the payment of loans to the Defendant as the Gwangju District Court 2013Gahap9569, and against C, the Defendant’s revocation of each of the above assignment of claims against C on the grounds that the aforementioned assignment of claims was a fraudulent act and sought the payment of each equivalent amount of compensation.

(hereinafter “instant lawsuit seeking revocation of fraudulent act.” The said parties are the implementation of the instant final judgment, the provisional disposition No. 2008 business group 24, which is the preservative measure of the instant case, and the provisional disposition of this case.