However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 28, 2018, at around 16:25, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant was able to listen to the drinking water from the victim J (the age of 59) in the “I” restaurant located in Ulsan-gu H, Ulsan-gu; (b) expressed the victim’s desire to “hump, hump, hump, hump”; (c) carried the victim’s breath, pushed the blap, was pushed down, pushed down, and flaped up twice the victim’s face outside of the said restaurant and drinking.

As a result, the defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, such as an influence of the number of days of treatment, a part of the back, and a part of the back head.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol against J;

1. A report on investigation (the sequence 14 of evidence list);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph (Evidence Nos. 6, 15);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 (1) of the Election of Imprisonment or Imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (hereinafter “the grounds for the remaining sentence”), which is favorable to the defendant;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include: (a) the violence of the defendant revealed in the applicable law and appearance of the crime; (b) the nature and circumstances of the crime in light of the circumstances at the time of the crime; (c) the responsibility for the crime in this case is not easy; (d) even though there are many kinds of records of punishment for the crime in the same kind of violent crime, the possibility of such criticism is not small; (b) the defendant committed the crime in this case; (c) the defendant was committed against the defendant; (d) the victim was aware of and against his own crime; and (d) the victim was committed a conflict with the defendant in the above restaurant at the time of the trial and in the street, the victim appears to have been pushed of the defendant's shoulder; and (d) the defendant was found to have brought about the crime in the process of setting up against it; and (e) the victim did not want to have been punished for the defendant on April 23, 2019.