beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.09.07 2019구단7049

상이등급상향거부처분취소의소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of disposition;

A. The plaintiff (B) entered on March 29, 1985 and was discharged from military service on September 9, 1987.

B. Around 15:30 on March 24, 1987, the Plaintiff was subject to an accident involving a high-frequency training shooting in the shooting range (hereinafter “instant accident”). Around March 19, 196, the Plaintiff was recognized as a soldier or policeman on duty on duty on duty and on March 19, 199, and was determined as a class VII disability rating for the complex of the right frame in the physical examination (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

C. On July 9, 2018, the Plaintiff was recognized as a physical restriction on the right hand hand hand hand, functional disorder, and disability on the right hand hand hand, and applied for a re-examination to the Defendant on July 9, 2018. On January 29, 2019, the Plaintiff was judged as identical to the previous grade by the Defendant. On January 29, 2019, the results of the physical examination at the time (if there are more than one part) and the results of the physical examination at this court

As a result of the body assessment of the standard of classification (normal), the body assessment of 0-150 0-140 0-140 0-140 80 o-80 o-50 o-70 o-60 o-60 o-60 o-60 o-60 o-60 o-60 o-60 o-60 o-60 o-60 o-5 0-30-50 o-30-50 o-10 o-20-20-15 o-10 o-60-5 o-70

D. The appraisal results of this Court determined as follows.

(E) The scope of the so-called elbow movement (260∑/310∑), the upper limit of the control movement (120∑/180∑), the upper limit of the control movement (120∑/180∑), and the upper limit of the control movement (the upper limit of the upper limit of the control movement) to the upper limit of the right elbow and the scope of the control movement for handbows, the upper limit of class 7124, the upper limit of 7°7204, the upper limit of 26∑/7204, the upper limit of 7°7312 due to the 7m reduction of the upper limit of the upper limit of 7m.

In addition to the opinion of the Ethymarism of the Ethymarism, the movement area is limited to more than 1/2 as a result of active movement restriction.