The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a BCA 110E two-wheeled vehicle from the front of the first apartment of the third apartment of the third apartment of the third 1793 in the city of the second string in the city of the second string in the city of the second string in the city of the second string in the city of the second string in the city of the second string in the city of the second string in the city of the second string in the city of the second string in the city of the second 20:5.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, while under the influence of alcohol, driven the said two-wheeled vehicle and left left to the center from the distance of environmental office building.

At all times, the signal, etc. is installed, the Defendant’s direction signal was red signaled, and the victim C (64 years) driven a Dtoscar car from this shooting distance to enter the intersection in accordance with green signals, and thus, the Defendant, who was engaged in driving a motor vehicle, had a duty of care to stop in accordance with the new subparagraph, was due to the occupational negligence of entering the intersection as it was, and the Defendant suffered injury such as salt, tension, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and the victim E (59 years old), who was the passenger, suffered injury, such as the fluor’s salt, tension, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A survey report on actual condition, notification of the results of regulating drinking driving, and a report on whether to drive any danger;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. The phrase “No. 2” stated in the indictment under Article 148-2 subparag. 2 subparag. 3 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts is apparent, and thus, it is ex officio dismissed without changing the indictment.

Article 44(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3(2)1 and 8 of the Act, Article 268 of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of penalty: Imprisonment with or without prison labor;