유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons for this Court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) Section 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance (“No.S.”) is “No.S. University” (which is a medical record appraiser) and the following are added; and (b) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is indicated. Therefore, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
[The plaintiff is basically repeating the same argument in the first instance trial. The plaintiff's statement in the evidence Nos. 6 through 18 (including the paper number) submitted in the trial, considering the allegations and reasons why the plaintiff partly supplemented in the trial, and the fact-finding results on the National Health Association Chairperson of the Korea Health Association of the Republic of Korea, even if examined, the first instance judgment is justifiable] / [Supplementary part] / [.......... on July 12, 2013 when the deceased was used by the deceased, the highest daily temperature was 30.5 %). However, according to the materials at the time, the highest temperature was 12 days from July 1, 2013 to July 12, 2013 to July 12, 2013, the highest temperature exceeded 30 x 12 days from July 1, 2013, and the date exceeding 27 x 1 to 1, 2715 days from July 1, 2015.
In light of the deceased’s age and physical condition, details of his duties, and work environment, etc., the Korea Meteorological Administration of the Republic of Korea takes the first step of the severe weather alert when it is anticipated that the highest weather temperature between June and September will continue for more than two days. The first step of the severe weather alert is made by the Korea Meteorological Administration of the Republic of Korea. The degree that the deceased’s body is significantly unreasonable. The Plaintiff does not seem to have reduced. 6. The part of the document (Evidence 11 of the A), “the Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Response to Health from Exposure,” prepared by the National Health Protection Committee of the Korea National Health Association under its control (i.e., the brain stroke) (i.e., the stroke).