However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 7, 2016, at around 00:10, the Defendant arrested the victim E (the 44 years old) who was a slope belonging to the Ulsan-gun Police Station D police box in front of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, as a separate assault case from the victim E (the 112 years old), and tried to board the victim on the 112 patrol vehicle. While the Defendant stated that “Ipson is a party, but Ippson is a party, Ipkn., Ipkn., Ipn., by hand, cut down the less part of the victim, and walk the victim’s spice at several times.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of the victim who is a police officer, and at the same time, he saw the victim as the left-hand part in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] General Injury (In general, from April to June) in the basic area (special mitigation) (special mitigation) / Cases of obstruction of performance of official duties / In the case of obstruction of performance of official duties / [decision of sentence] the defendant has been sentenced to a fine four times for the same kind of crime, on the other hand, he has no record of being sentenced to a fine four times for the same crime; on the other hand, he has deposited one million won for the victim, and he supports two children.