사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.
The defendant shall be liable to the applicant E for damage KRW 352,350,000,00.
Punishment of the crime
On August 28, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Seoul Central District Court on August 28, 2009 and was released on July 30, 2012 during the execution of the sentence in a female prison, and was released on September 8, 2012, and there are more criminal records of the same kind other than for
[2016 Highest 5346] The Defendant, on May 21, 2013, from the mutual infinite house located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dobong-gu, Dobong-dong, Defendant E through G, “The court has 1.1 billion won.”
It is possible to find out the money to pay taxes.
In the case of lending KRW 19 million under the pretext of tax, the Jeju-do agency will pay money within 10 days per week.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, the fact that the defendant did not have certain property or income, and did not have the right to claim the refund of the National Treasury, and was living with the borrowed money borrowed from others, so there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received KRW 460,60,000 from the time to March 30, 2015, a sum of KRW 19,000,000 from the time of the loan to the time of 62 times as stated in the List of Crimes 1, such as receiving KRW 19,00,000 from the victim’s agricultural bank account (H) to the money borrowed from the victim on the same day.
[2016 Highest 5516]
1. On October 10, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim F, who was aware of the husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s hospital expenses, was posted a phone to the victim F, who was aware of the husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s wife, and the fact was false, such as “a request to lend necessary expenses for the loan after receiving a loan from the National Treasury refund or having no intention or ability to repay the money borrowed from the victim,” and “a request to lend the money borrowed from the National Treasury because the money was not seized by the National Tax Service.”
The defendant belongs to this.