However, each of the above Defendants for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant B, on March 2017, 2017, hereinafter referred to as “2017 Highest 1339”), Defendant B, having slaughtered a dog to see public good, and had the knowledge of food in mind.

E with 50,000 won and purchased the same person, and then the defendant A was able to pay the veterinary expenses and requested the slaughter.

1. Violation of the Defendants’ Animal Protection Act

(a) No person shall injure an animal by taking advantage of any instrument or drug;

Nevertheless, at around 12:00 on March 25, 2017, the Defendants connected the above E to the roads located in Jeju-si F with the string of the west of the Defendant A, Defendant A driving the west of the west, and Defendant B forced the said dog by a method of driving the vehicle behind the Defendant B while driving the vehicle in the following manner, and continued to attract the west of the west of the west and the neck of the west of the west to the west of the above west, thereby abusing the Defendants.

(b) No person shall kill an animal by cruel means, such as hanging the animal;

Nevertheless, at around 13:00 on March 25, 2017, the Defendants: (a) connected with the Defendant’s residence A, adjacent to the Defendant’s dwelling in Jeju Island, and (b) died in a cruel manner by linking the wire ropes to the hacks installed therein; and (c) Defendant B conspired on the side by complying with it in a manner of crueling it.

"2017 Highest 1948"

2. On July 12, 2017, Defendant B driven an I car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.05% in a section of about 20km from the front of the Defendant’s house located in H on the Jeju-si at the Jeju-si to the front of the Gyeongma Park in the Jeju-si at the Jeju-si.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to E and J;

1. A written accusation;

1.Each photograph;