Defendant

F, A, G, C, H, I, D, E, K, and J are apartment residents and victim N are the chairperson of M apartment management (the suspension of duties on June 9, 2017).

On March 4, 2017, the Defendants, like approximately 30 apartment residents, had been dissatisfied with the management of the apartment in order for the victim N, the president of the apartment management office of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, to conduct the management of the apartment, raised the management expenses on a sole basis without disregarding the apartment management rules, and raised objections against the use of the management expenses indiscreetly.

1. On March 4, 2017, Defendant F’s assaulted Defendant F, who was the president of M apartment management office, to show management account books by which details of the use of apartment management fees can be verified, and requested, but did not show, Defendant F entered the management office to confirm account books. During entering the entrance of the management office to check account books, Defendant F, who was the victim’s body part in front of the entrance, was pushed up one time into the right side part of the entrance, and faced with the wall.

2. Defendant A’s property damage, around March 4, 2017, at the same place as “1:28,” the same as “1,000,” was found in the management account books, etc., Defendant A’s property damage caused the utility of property, such as putting the 120,000 won of the market price on the books of the victim N, the president of apartment management, on the floor, and breaking the strawle.

3. The Defendants’ obstruction of the duties (other Defendants than Defendant A) committed an act of force, such as the defect that the injured party, who was the chairperson of the apartment management office, entered into the management office in the front of the entrance of the management office, in order to communicate with the residents of the victim N who was the chairperson of the apartment management office at around 12:00 on March 4, 2017, at the same place as the above “1,” and whether the damaged party, who was the chairperson of the apartment management office, went into the management office on a one-time basis in order to communicate with the residents of the victim N, the chairperson of the apartment management office at around 12:00.