However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 21:05 on August 21, 2015, 2015, at the Defendant’s house, “A police officer belonging to the Ansan Police Station, who was dispatched upon receipt of 112 a report, posted a 30-minute check at the house,” and said, “I am on the floor of the Defendant, I am bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a son.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene, victims, and photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 144 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act which choose a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Basic sphere of the types of obstruction of performance of official duties (in the case of coercion of performance of official duties) (6 months to 1 year and 4 months); and

2. The age, character and conduct, environment, details of the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime, etc. are committed, as the crime has been committed contrary to the decision of sentence.