except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 16, 2014, the Defendant was driving a newcompurd car B on June 16, 2014, and came to turn to the left at the upper right level from the ESS room to the upper right level. The Defendant was operating a newcompured XD car, which is located in the 99-10-10 of the SSS-ro in Gwangju-si.

There are three-distance crossings where no signal is installed, so in such cases, the defendant engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to check the safety of the course and turn to the left by properly examining the left-hand turn prior to the left-hand turn.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to make a left-hand turn without neglecting this, found it late after the victim C(66 years old) driver's DaBAVOki, who was straight from the right-hand side of the frith of the frith of the frith of the frith of the frith of the frith of the frith of the car of the Defendant, and got the victim go beyond the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer serious injury due to the above occupational negligence, which requires the victim to receive approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each investigation report (the state of the victim, and the opinion of the doctor for serious injury);

1. Medical certificate and medical opinion (whether serious injury is involved);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a summary map, on-site photograph, and road situation photograph;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. The reason for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant's crime of this case with the reason for the sentencing of the sentencing in light of the following facts: (a) the victim suffered serious injury as stated in its reasoning due to the crime of this case; and (b) the defendant's negligence cannot be easily assessed to the left-hand left-hand without confirming the career safety. However, the nature and circumstances of the crime of the defendant are not good, but different.