On February 11, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months by obstructing the performance of official duties in the Changwon District Court’s branch on February 11, 2015, and the execution of the sentence was completed at the Changwon Prison on August 7, 2016.

At around 14:15 on December 16, 2016, the Defendant said that, prior to the commencement food of the Gannam Culture and Arts Promotion Institute, Gancheon-gun, Gancheon-gun, Gancheon-do, the Defendant said that, on a multiple occasions, the Defendant took a dangerous object used at his/her home (the total length: 25 cm, the blade length: 14 cm), and she walked as an event site, the Defendant said that “draise, fat, fat, and fat, fat, and throw away several times,” on the ground that noise occurred due to the commencement of the construction.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects that are likely to be used for violent crimes without justifiable reasons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to C and A;

1. Article 7 of the relevant Act and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 7 of the Punishment of Violences, etc., and the selection of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes is that the defendant confessions the crime of this case, the health condition and economic condition of the defendant are not good, etc. that are favorable to the defendant.

However, according to the evidence, even if the Defendant had been sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime in the previous time and completed the execution of the punishment for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant appears to have committed the crime in this case at least four months, the Defendant appears to have suffered harm or harm to unspecified persons at the time of committing the crime. However, it is questionable whether the Defendant is seriously against his/her mistake or not, and the fact that the Defendant was absent on the trial date repeatedly is unfavorable to the Defendant.

(2).