2. The judgment of the defendant committed a crime interfering with the performance of official duties for a period of three months, and the second crime was committed while being tried for the first crime, and interference with the disturbance in the hospital emergency room is a need for punishment only because it could affect the treatment of other emergency patients, and there are several records of punishment for violent crimes committed against the defendant.

However, considering the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions indicated in the pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstance after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentencing cannot be deemed unfair merely because it is too unfasible and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.