beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.09.25 2015고정546

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a rocketing car.

On March 28, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on July 28, 2015, and proceeded one-lane road in front of the Seocho-do, which is in the two-lane dong at the time of macroscoping from the side of the treatment hospital to the northwest of the Shiscopic Sea Ships.

At the same time, the victim C(34 years old) was coming to the edge of the above road on the same side as the above car, so the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by properly operating the steering gear and operating the steering system and operating the steering system well after checking whether there is a pedestrian by driving the motor vehicle on the front side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the left side of the said passenger car by his negligence, which led to a shocking on the victim's left side.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim’s injury to the left-hand side in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police interrogation protocol of the accused (including the C substitute part);

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each traffic accident-related photograph and diagnostic certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.