출입국관리법위반
The punishment against the Defendants shall be set at KRW 10 million.
Defendant
A does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of soil construction business, etc., which is a company that performs the steel construction work of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment construction business by subcontracting. Defendant A is the representative director of the said company.
2. Defendant A
(a) No person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities of foreigners shall employ a person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, as prescribed by Presidential Decree;
On October 17, 2016, the Defendant employed D, who entered China, from October 28, 2016, as an overseas Korean qualification (F-4) who was unable to engage in simple labor activities at the construction site and at the overseas Korean qualification (F-4).
In addition, the Defendant employed 34 foreigners from August 25, 2016 to November 25, 2016, who did not have the status of stay to engage in job-seeking activities as described in the attached crime list.
(b) No person who employs a non-professional employment visa without obtaining permission to change his/her workplace shall employ a foreigner who has not obtained permission to change or add his/her workplace in advance from the Minister of Justice within the scope of his/her sojourn status;
On November 20, 2016, the Defendant entered the above construction site and non-professional employment qualification (E-9) to Vietnam and non-professional employment qualification (E-9) who worked for the Marine Development Corporation, and employed up to November 23, 2016, even though two foreign persons, such as Vietnam, F, etc. working for the Marine Products, did not obtain permission to change the workplace from the Minister of Justice, even though they did not obtain permission to change the workplace from the Minister of Justice.
3. Defendant B, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 2, the Defendant, a representative of the Defendant, committed a violation as prescribed in paragraph 2 in relation to the Defendant’s business.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Accusation of an immigration offender;
1. A statement on payment of labor cost for each daily use;
1. Register of reported foreign nationality Koreans' residence in the Republic of Korea;
1.Each.