1. From around 03:00 on June 27, 2013 to 03:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim D’s desire to “a sprinke a sprinke” on the ground that the business operation was completed by the victim D; (b) and (c) continued to collect the sprink, etc. on the sprink where he was on the sprinke; and (d) took one time the face of the victim E (30 years of age) who was an employee of the said sprinke; and (b) took the sprink by assaulting the sprink on several occasions, etc., the customers who were in the said sprinke around the sprinke were able to get out of the sprinke.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main duties and assaulted the victim E by force.

2. At around 03:30 on June 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) pursuant to paragraph (1) of the above Category C, the Defendant: (b) threatened the police officer G to take a bath to “Is the police officer G who was dispatched after having received a report that the Defendant would escape from disturbance; and (c) caused it to go against G during the process of carrying out the police officer’s task; (d) the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of his/her duties by taking advantage of the following circumstances: (a) the slope H, who is a slope belonging to the same police box, would have attempted to go back; and (b) the Defendant, at the same time, tried to take a bath for any defect that he/she would attempt to turn out; and (b) the Defendant continued to take part in the military box, who was a slope belonging to the Is box, who continued to take part in the military; and (b) the Defendant interfered with the victim’s faces’s face to the police officer’s port by interfering with maintaining the order of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to E, H and J;

1. Written statements (D);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV photographic data;

1. Article 314 (1), Articles 260 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The Criminal Act among concurrent crimes.