1. Around January 27, 2018, the Defendant insultingd the victims of the instant accident by publicly citing the victim E, who is a policeman belonging to the C District, who was asked about the details of the report from the victim E, a police officer belonging to the C District, who was called up after having received 112 a report regarding illegal parking vehicles on the street in front of the C District, 31-5 Kaman apartment house on a 2018.27. 201. 21:46 at the same time, the Defendant: (a) provided the victim E, a police officer belonging to the C District; and (b) provided an inquiry about the details of the report by the C District; and (c) provided the victim E, the police officer belonging to the C District; and (d) provided the said D with a large number of unspecified persons, who were asked for the c

2. In order to prevent additional damage, such as property damage, etc., by intending to go to the parking vehicle in question at the above time and place, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the prevention of crimes D, by assaulting the above patrolman, by putting the two arms of the above D, with the hand hand, and obstructing the above D’s execution of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Reporting on investigation (to hear statements made in D by the Control Police Agency);

1. Each complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work place;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes: The defendant took a bath and took violence against a police officer who performs his/her legitimate duty, and the circumstances that the defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of, even though he/she was during the period of suspended execution due to a special assault, etc., there are two cases where the nature of such crime is not good, and there are two cases where he/she committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he/she was committed during the period of suspended execution due to a special assault: The degree of assault is relatively excessive, and the records and changes of the defendant's age, family relations, motive and background of the crime, circumstances after the crime