beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.01 2017나65920

물품대금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Summary of the parties' arguments;

A. Upon Plaintiff’s request from the Defendant, from July 14, 2016 to August 20, 2016, the Plaintiff supplied 100 Won each of 16,46,200 Won each of 16,486, and 4 Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do 'C'’’ to the Defendant. Thus, the Defendant is liable to pay 0 Do 60 won each of the above 60 Do Do 1,686 x 9,686 x 1,70 won each of the above 4 Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do 1 card’s Do 1,60 Do 1,60 Do 1,60 Do 1,60 Do 1,60 Do 50 Do Do 50

B. With respect to the cost of the part-time processing of Defendant 1 even numbered unit, Defendant 1: (a) contracted for the part-time processing of clothing manufacturing from the Defendant’s husband “C; and (b) subcontracted it to G operating “F; (c) G requested the Plaintiff to part-time processing; (d) as a result, the Plaintiff supplied the part-time processing to the Plaintiff as “F factory”; and (e) G supplied the part-time processing using the part-time processing supplied by the Plaintiff; and (e) supplied it to E.g., the Plaintiff only supplied the part-time processing at the Plaintiff’s request; and there was no supply of the part-time processing to the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant does not bear the obligation to pay the part-time processing of the part-time processing to the Plaintiff.

② Even if the Defendant is liable to pay the letter processing cost to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the letter processing cost to the Plaintiff, as requested by the designer of “C”.