If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

On October 18, 2014, the Defendant is a person engaging in driving of a vehicle B with low speed. On October 20, 2014, the Defendant driving of the said vehicle at around 20:00, and driving the said vehicle at around 30 km in speed from the side of the Peace Park along one lane, and driving the vehicle at about 30 km in speed. Since there is a center line installed and there is a large moving of the vehicle, the vehicle driver has a duty of care not to intrude the central line. However, the Defendant neglected the duty of care and caused the victim C (the 47 years old) who passed the vehicle to the opposite opposite to the central line due to the occupational negligence, and caused the victim to mine the left-hand part of the said vehicle, which requires approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of a written statement concerning the occurrence of a traffic accident prepared C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes stated in a written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;