2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The housing association of this case filed a lawsuit claiming ownership transfer registration based on the right to claim sale against the plaintiffs, etc. and the plaintiffs, etc. to the defendant 1) The housing association of this case filed a lawsuit claiming ownership transfer registration and delivery of buildings, etc. in accordance with the Urban Improvement Act against the owners of land, etc. within the business zone including the plaintiffs, who do not consent to the establishment of the association, by claiming sale in accordance with the Urban Improvement Act. The housing association of this case decided to appoint the defendant as the legal representative in relation to the lawsuit, such as ownership transfer registration, etc. filed by the housing association of this case on March 2015.

* * Prepaid: Each successful remuneration of KRW 2 million to KRW 3 million (in full and partial winning, agreement formation): 5% of the judgment amount in excess of the amount presented by the association (Additional 3). On the other hand, the Defendant, at the Plaintiff’s request, conducted a lawsuit on behalf of the Plaintiffs, etc. who filed the lawsuit for the registration of ownership transfer against the Plaintiffs, etc. in Seoul Central District Court, on March 2015, after preparing and sealing a litigation delegation contract with no contingent fee, there is only the advance payment as follows, and the contingent fee has been delivered to A. * the contingent fee of KRW 2 million to KRW 3 million (in full and partial winning, agreement formation): The Defendant did not win the lawsuit on behalf of the Plaintiffs, etc. who filed the lawsuit for the registration of ownership transfer, and the above court lost its effect upon the Plaintiff’s request for the registration of ownership transfer, etc. against the Plaintiffs, etc. in the instant housing association’s claim against the Seoul Central District Court.